
From INSIDER, Newsletter for employees of Ames Laboratory, Vol. 13, No. 4, April 2002
Rural Law Enforcement Speaks Out
Workshop seeks input on rural forensic needs
Access to training and building networks for sharing expertise were two of many
concerns voiced by rural law
enforcement officials when they
gathered in Ames March 28 for a workshop sponsored by the Midwest Forensics Resource
Center. The workshop brought together county sheriffs and deputies, and local police
officials from across the state for input on the forensic-related needs of rural law
enforcement agencies.
Information gathered at the workshop will be used by MFRC to plot the course for the centers future direction. Earlier this year, the MFRC received $3 million in federal funding from the National Institute of Justice Office of Science and Technology. The centers mission includes research, training, casework and education in conjunction with ISU. Ames Laboratory will be administering the center.
The workshop featured presentations by the Iowa Division of Criminal Investigation and the Iowa Criminalistics Laboratory. While both agencies provide assistance to law enforcement throughout the state, the states budget woes will likely stretch that aid even thinner. With limited resources and staffing, processing of crime scenes and evidence could increasingly fall to local officials.
In general, participants noted that the composition of rural crime is generally similar to the composition of urban crime, and that rural crime totals are only slightly higher than they have been in the recent past. However, new trends in rural crime are emerging. Law enforcement officers in rural areas are beginning to see more drug-related offenses, more arson and more violent crime.
While Iowas larger cities have their own crime-scene
investigation units, rural law enforcement agencies face a number of challenges. The types
of evidence associated with these trends can be more subtle and more complex than the
types of evidence sought in other investigations. As a group, the rural officers were in
agreement that they needed more information about current forensics practices, more
education and training in forensics, more special casework assistance to help them with
unusual situations, and new technology to speed their analysis of crime scenes and
evidence.
Another common concern voiced was that such specialized training is expensive and difficult to find. And once local officers receive forensic training, they immediately become desirable recruits for higher-paying positions with larger departments.
"Small agencies provide the training and create a product that is very marketable," said Hamilton County Sheriff Scott Anderson. "For example, this area has recently lost several trained officers to the St. Paul area."
Another problem mentioned was that without some type of training certification, evidence collected and the way it is handled can be called into question when criminals are brought to trial. And it isnt always the defense whos raising the issues. According to some officers present, even their own county and local prosecutors are hesitant to use local expertise on the witness stand.
The scope of crimes also poses problems, particularly when they involve computer crime, intricate financial dealings, or even murder investigations. Some agencies may only deal with one such crime every several years, making it hard to justify a particular type of training or allow someone trained in such an area to regularly practice those skills.
One answer to a number of these questions is to form task forces among several local
agencies in order to share
expertise. This
would lessen training costs for the individual departments and allow officers to apply
their training more regularly. At the same time, such teams could increase the level of
forensic skill practiced in rural Iowa. Representatives from state agencies also believed
that some forensic analyses now performed by the ICL in Des Moines might be performed at
the local level, and that this could help to speed local investigations.
Interestingly, both groups agreed that they needed to co-op new forms of decentralized training, new forms of crime-scene management, and new forms of forensic analyses. One example of this is the effectiveness of forensic training now cooperatively organized by the DCI, ICL, International Identification Association and the Marshalltown police department.
The results of the workshop will be circulated among the participants and the members of Iowas Congressional Delegation. The participants hope that their increasing need for forensic expertise, their serious resource shortages, and their willingness to share the costs associated with the modernization of rural forensic practices could attract congressional support in the future.
The overwhelming majority of the participants said (in their workshop evaluations) that this kind of workshop is necessary to voicing rural law enforcements forensic-related needs. They also agreed that MFRC, Ames Laboratory, and ISU sponsorship of the workshop made it more possible to attend.
The MFRC will serve Iowa and several surrounding states, including Wisconsin, Minnesota, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Kansas and Missouri.
For more sciences stories from Ames Laboratory, click here.
Last revision: 4/29/02 mjg